Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Chasidut for Bava Kamma 127:16

מה יש לך להביא שאר ב"ח כשהוא אומר חיים הרי חיים אמור הא מה אני מקיים גניבה לרבות כל דבר אם המצא תמצא ל"ל

— If so, I might say that just as the specification mentions an object which is eligible to be sacrificed upon the altar, so also any object eligible to be sacrificed upon the altar is [included]. What does this enable you to include? Sheep.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 370, n. 7. ');"><sup>15</sup></span> But when the text continues 'sheep', we have sheep explicitly stated. What then am I to make of 'theft'? It must be to include any object. [If that is so] should Scripture not have mentioned only 'theft', 'ox', 'sheep' and 'alive' since everything would have then been included?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why indeed this emphasis on the verb 'found'? ');"><sup>14</sup></span> — If so, I might still say that just as the specification mentions an object which is subject to the sanctity of first birth, so also any object which is subject to the sanctity of first birth [should be included]. What does this enable you to include? Ass. But when the text continues 'ass', we have ass explicitly stated. What then am I to make of 'theft'? It must be to include any object. [But in that case] should Scripture not have mentioned only 'theft', 'ox', 'sheep', 'ass' and 'alive', since everything would have then been included?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why indeed this emphasis on the verb 'found'? ');"><sup>14</sup></span> — If so I might still say that just as the specification mentions objects possessing life, so also any other object possessing life [should be included]. What does this enable you to include? All other objects possessing life. But when the text continues 'alive', objects possessing life are explicitly stated. What then am I to make of 'theft'? [It must be] to include any other object whatsoever. And if so, why do I require the words 'if to be found it be found'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. note 2. This concludes the argument of the School of Hezekiah. ');"><sup>16</sup></span>

Kedushat Levi

An alternative explanation to the 13 attributes of G’s listed by ‎the Torah in our portion. It is an accepted rule that the written ‎Torah may be studied and understood better by using the 13 ‎principles of Rabbi Yishmael that we recite in our prayers every ‎morning. The 13 attributes of G’d that Moses lists in our portion ‎may be understood as corresponding to this. The exegetical tool ‎described as ‎בנין אב‎ in Rabbi Yishmael’s list (# 3 in that list) is ‎none other than ‎חן‎, “grace.” We, the Jewish people, enjoy grace in ‎the eyes of the Lord. Let us clarify this by means of a parable. If a ‎young child says something clever, the father is pleased to hear ‎this and he enjoys this even if he is aware that the clever saying ‎had not originated in the mind of the child itself, but reflects ‎something that his mother had taught him. The father, in spite ‎of his intellectual superiority to his child, “lowers” himself to the ‎child’s level in order to enjoy his child’s achievement. The reason ‎he does so is because there exists a bond between a father and ‎child called ‎חן‎, “grace or charm.” When G’d “restrains Himself,” as ‎we pointed out repeatedly, one of the reasons is also that He ‎relates to His Children of Israel like a father, and this bond of ‎חן‎ ‎exists between them. The reason why the third of the 3 categories ‎of valid exegetical tools in Rabbi Yishmael’s list is called ‎בנין אב‎, ‎‎“basic rule,” is that it parallels this “given” (rather than acquired) ‎relationship between a Creator and His derivative, i.e. His child, in ‎this case His brainchild.‎
Let us now look at Rabbi Yishmael’s fourth category of ‎legitimate exegetical tools, the one known as ‎כלל ופרט‎, ‎generalities and specifics (or the reverse.) This principle ‎corresponds to the Divine attributes of ‎ארך‎ and ‎אפים‎, respectively. ‎In order to understand this, we will again resort to a parable. A ‎father, regardless of his son’s intelligence, loves him loyally as his ‎flesh and blood. A similar relationship exists between G’d and His ‎‎“children,” [seeing He is a partner in any human being, ‎having supplied one third of its components by contributing the ‎soul. Ed.] There is another aspect to this love of father ‎for son; because he loves him he constantly tries to teach him so ‎that he will become more intelligent and more mature mentally. ‎This aspect of parental love is known as ‎כלל ופרט וכלל‎.
Let us know explain the Divine attribute of ‎ארך‎, i.e. that G’d ‎loves us regardless of whether we are intelligent enough to realize ‎that we ought to revere Him and to love Him, He does not ‎withdraw His love from us. It follows that the attribute of ‎ארך‎ ‎corresponds to the exegetical tool of Torah exegesis known as ‎‏ כלל ‏ופרט‎, relating collective terms to specific terms.
The Divine ‎attribute of ‎אפים‎, is how G’d, out of His love for us, teaches us ‎how to serve Him, so that the combined attributes ‎ארך אפים‎, ‎correspond to Rabbi Yishmael’s exegetical tool known as ‎כלל ופרט ‏וכלל‎, establishing harmony between collective terms and specifics, ‎so that they do not contradict one another. This is why the ‎Talmud in Baba kamma 54 describes the latter ‎כלל ‏‎, as ‎adding an additional element.‎[I have not understood the Talmud there in that way. ‎Ed.]‎‎ ‎
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse