Commentary for Arakhin 45:19

אין לו הפרה

- Rather, they are disputing here on the principle as to whether absolution from consecration of an object may be obtained;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Eliezer holds that no vow to the Treasury can be nullified by a plea of error, hence he might resort to a conspiracy by divorcing his wife. But R. Joshua holds that a plea of error would be admitted, whence there is no need for him to engage in a conspiracy wherefore he need not deny himself by vow the benefit of her company.');">⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Arakhin 45:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.