Commentary for Bava Batra 155:11
תא שמע רבי יהודה אומר פעמים מכורין פעמים שאינן מכורין מאי לאו אמאי דקאמר תנא קמא קאי רבי יהודה לא רבי יהודה
to be on it'. Come and hear: R. JUDAH SAYS: SOMETIMES IT IS SOLD, SOMETIMES IT IS NOT SOLD. Now, does not R. Judah presumably base his statement on what the first Tanna has said? [And since R. Judah specifically<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. the last clause of the Mishnah. ');"><sup>36</sup></span> deals with the case when the equipment is upon the ass, the first Tanna must also be speaking of a similar case!]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' How then could it be said that the dispute in the Mishnah relates to the case when the equipment is not upon the ass? ');"><sup>37</sup></span> — No; R. Judah
Explore commentary for Bava Batra 155:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.