Commentary for Bava Batra 193:10

וכיון דקא שקיל ורמי להו למנא אחשבינהו לא צריכא שנתמד מאליו

R. Johanan said in the name of R. Simeon b. Jehozadak: The same [laws] that have been said [to apply] in respect of their prohibitions<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That in the case of terumah, e.g., the first and the second infusions but not the third, and in the case of the tithe, the first but not the second, are regarded as the original wine, and are subject to its restrictions. ');">¹⁷</span> have similarly been said [to apply] in respect of their making objects fit [for Levitical uncleanness].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Certain objects such as grain, fruit, etc. are not subject to Levitical uncleanness unless they have been first brought in contact with certain liquids. V. Lev. XI. ');">¹⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 193:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.