Commentary for Bava Batra 228:2
האשה את בנה וכו': הא תו למה לי הא תנא ליה רישא האיש את אמו והאיש את אשתו
and then sit down again.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To issue the verdict. The testator is thus prevented from withdrawing, since the session which had dealt with his case has terminated. ');"><sup>4</sup></span> The law is in accordance with [the view] of R. Joseph in the case of Field,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When one of the heirs has a field adjoining the field that is to be divided (cf. supra 12b). ');"><sup>5</sup></span> Subject<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'So long as they are dealing with the same subject' (the case under discussion). ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Batra 228:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.