Commentary for Bava Batra 259:8

אמר רב יהודה אמר שמואל הלכה כרבי יוחנן בן ברוקה וכן אמר רבא הלכה כר' יוחנן בן ברוקה

is of the opinion that they did dispute.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Our Mishnah, then, may be explained to represent the view of the first Tanna. Hence it is possible to suggest that R. Johanan maintains, as has been suggested above, that another legal heir may be appointed even where there is a son etc. ');">¹⁴</span> [And] if you prefer,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., if there is an objection to the assumption that R. Ishmael was in dispute with another Tanna as to whether his own father was or was not in disagreement with the Sages. ');">¹⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 259:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.