Commentary for Bava Batra 277:2

אמר עולא לא קשיא כאן בבנו כאן באחר הואיל ודעתו של אדם קרובה אצל בנו:

for the buyer!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the buyer must pay the price, at which the fruit was valued, to the heirs. This proves that even attached fruit does not belong to him to whom the soil belongs but to the heirs. In the case, then, of our Mishnah also, attached fruit should belong to all the heirs. ');">⁴</span> — 'Ulla replied: There is no difficulty Here<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In our Mishnah. ');">⁵</span> [the law deals] with one's [own] son;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the estate was assigned by a father to a son, and the latter did not sell it to another person. ');">⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 277:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.