Commentary for Bava Batra 300:10

אמר נכסי לפלניא עבדא איקרי נכסי דתנן הכותב כל נכסיו לעבדו יצא בן חורין ארעא איקרי נכסי דתנן נכסים שיש להן אחריות נקנין בכסף ובשטר ובחזקה גלימא איקרי נכסי דתנן ושאין להן אחריות אין נקנין אלא במשיכה

from movables.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That is in accordance with Talmudic Law. In virtue, however, of a Gaonic enactment ascribed to R. Hunai (8th century), a Kethubah is payable also out of movables; v. Eben ha-'Ezer, 100. 1.] ');">¹⁹</span> Amemar said: Movables that are entered in the <i>kethubah</i> and are [also] available, are [regarded as] a reservation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because from such movables a kethubah may be collected as from real estate, v. Keth. 55a. If the husband, therefore, reserved these for her, she loses her rights to the kethubah as if he had reserved for her real estate. ');">²⁰</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 300:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.