Commentary for Bava Batra 338:11
אמר ליה לתקוני שדרתיך ולא לעוותי זיל זבנה מיניה שלא באחריות והדר זבנה ניהלה באחריות:
[could have] claimed [his compensation from the seller's lands].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., and what'. ');"><sup>30</sup></span> R. Ashi said: [The omission of the clause] pledging property [is] not [regarded as] the scribe's error; and the meaning of<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., and what'. ');"><sup>30</sup></span> 'with the omission [of the clause] pledging property' is that no such clause is entered in the deed.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'that pledging is not written in it'. ');"><sup>31</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Batra 338:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.