Commentary for Bava Batra 349:1
הכא נמי אדם עשוי שלא להשביע את עצמו
[could it not then be said] here<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the case of consecrated property. ');"><sup>1</sup></span> also [that] a person is wont to disclaim wealth for himself!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Consequently, it might be rightly assumed that his admission of indebtedness to a creditor amounted to no more than a desire to conceal his wealth. How then could R. Huna state that the sum specified must be paid to the creditor? ');"><sup>2</sup></span> — R. Huna gave his ruling there<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the case of consecrated property. ');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Batra 349:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.