Commentary for Bava Kamma 133:8

אמרי התם איכא שינוי השם דמעיקרא טיבלא והשתא תרומה הקדש מעיקרא חולין והשתא הקדש

should it not also be the same? — There, however, the law of a receptacle applied to it while it was still detached, whereas here it was never subject to the law of a receptacle while it was detached. An objection was raised [from the following]: If a thief, a robber or an annas<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The same as the hamsan, who, as explained supra p. 361 is prepared to pay for the objects which he misappropriates. ');">¹⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 133:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.