Commentary for Bava Kamma 145:12
הוזמו על הטביחה הוא משלם תשלומי כפל והן משלמין תשלומי שלשה
— It may be said that we are dealing here with a case where they were first declared <i>zomemim</i> regarding their evidence about the slaughter. But it may still be argued that after all since when they were subsequently declared <i>zomemim</i> regarding the theft, it became clear retrospectively that when they gave evidence regarding the slaughter, they had already been disqualified. Why then should they pay the retaliation penalty for the slaughter?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since their evidence regarding slaughter should have fallen to the ground even without their having to be proved zomemim with reference to it. ');"><sup>12</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 145:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.