Commentary for Bava Kamma 145:16
אלא לאו בשתי עדיות בעדות אחת כעין שתי עדיות ומאי נינהו כת אחת בזה אחר זה אבל בעדות אחת בבת אחת לא
formed the point at issue between the following Tannaim: If two witnesses gave evidence against a person that he had stolen an ox and the same witnesses also testified against him that he had slaughtered it, and were declared <i>zomemim</i> regarding the theft, as their evidence became annulled in part<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the theft. ');"><sup>16</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 145:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.