Commentary for Bava Kamma 145:8
אמרי הכא במאי עסקינן כגון שהוזמו על הטביחה תחילה
We have learnt: IF A THIEF [IS CONVICTED OF THE THEFT OF AN OX] ON THE EVIDENCE OF TWO WITNESSES, AND OF THE SLAUGHTER OR SALE OF IT ON THE EVIDENCE OF THE SAME TWO, AND THESE WITNESSES ARE SUBSEQUENTLY PROVED <i>ZOMEMIM</i>, THEY MUST PAY [THE ACCUSED] IN FULL. Does this not mean that they first gave evidence regarding the theft and then<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On a subsequent occasion. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 145:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.