Commentary for Bava Kamma 145:9
אמרי סוף סוף כי הדרי מיתזמי אגניבה איגלאי מילתא דכי אסהדו אטביחה פסולין הוו אמאי משלמי אטביחה
gave evidence again regarding the slaughter, and that they were proved <i>zomemim</i> regarding their evidence about the theft and then were proved <i>zomemim</i> regarding their evidence about the slaughter? Now, if you assume that a witness proved <i>zomem</i> becomes disqualified retrospectively, [it would surely follow that] as soon as these witnesses were declared <i>zomemim</i> regarding the theft, it became clear retrospectively that when they gave evidence regarding the slaughter<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., on a subsequent occasion. ');"><sup>9</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 145:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.