Commentary for Bava Kamma 146:1
לאו כדיבור דמי ורבי יוסי סבר תוך כדי דיבור כדיבור דמי
are not equivalent in law to a single undivided statement,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the evidence as to the theft and the evidence as to the slaughter could in no manner be considered as one, but are completely independent testimonies, and if the accusation of zomem was proved regarding the latter the former could not be affected. ');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 146:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.