Commentary for Bava Kamma 170:16

תא שמע המכה אביו ואמו ולא עשה בהן חבורה והחובל בחבירו ביום הכפורים

What would be the legal position?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Regarding the payment for Depreciation. ');">¹³</span> [Shall we say that] since it will ultimately recover fully he need not pay him [for the value of the arm], or perhaps [not so], since for the time being he diminished his value? — Come and hear:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Infra p. 87a. ');">¹⁴</span> If one strikes his father and his mother without making on them a bruise,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which case the capital offence of Ex. XXI, 25 has not been committed; v. Sanh. 84b. ');">¹⁵</span> or injures another man on the Day of Atonement,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The violation of which entails no capital punishment at the hands of a court of law; cf. Lev. XXIII, 30 and Ker. I, 1. Again, though lashes could be involved in this case in accordance with Mak. III, 2, the civil liability holds good as supra p. 407. ');">¹⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 170:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.