Commentary for Bava Kamma 170:4

ואכתי מבעי ליה לכדאמרן למיתני ביה קרא בריפוי א"כ לימא קרא או רפא רפא או ירפא ירפא מאי ורפא ירפא ש"מ ליתן רפואה במקום נזק

— If so [that it was to be utilised solely for that implication] Scripture would have said, 'Let the physician cause him to be healed' — This shows that payment for Healing should be made even in the case where Depreciation [is paid independently]. But still, is not the text required as said above to provide a double mention in respect of Healing? — If so, Scripture should have said either 'to cause to heal [and] to cause to heal'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., a repetition of the infinitive. ');">⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 170:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.