Commentary for Bava Kamma 210:15

לא בה ולא במוצאה קושטא אשתבע אימא בה ובמוצאה

[and the oath was subsequently admitted by him to have been false], he would be exempt, but R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon makes him liable.'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Shebu. 32a. ');">²²</span> In what fundamental principle do they differ? — The [latter] Master<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e. R. Eleazar b. Simeon who follows the view of his father, cf. supra 71b. ');">²³</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 210:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.