Commentary for Bava Kamma 214:6
א"ל זו לא שמעתי כיוצא בה שמעתי דא"ר אסי א"ר יוחנן הטוען טענת אבד ונשבע וחזר וטען טענת גנב ונשבע ובאו עדים פטור מ"ט לאו משום דקנה בשבועה ראשונה
R. Johanan [on the contrary] said thus: The ruling<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Regarding the liability for double payment. ');"><sup>12</sup></span> was meant to apply where the animal was still standing at the crib.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And no conversion was committed; v. also J. Shebu. VIII, 3. ');"><sup>13</sup></span> R. Ze'ira then said to R. Hiyya b. Abba: Did he mean to say that this is so<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Regarding the liability for double payment. ');"><sup>12</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 214:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.