Commentary for Bava Kamma 219:15
תניא אידך אשם זה קרן המושב זה חומש או אינו אלא אשם זה חומש למאי נפקא מינה לאפוקי ממתניתין דתנן נתן לו את הקרן ולא נתן לו את החומש אין החומש מעכב אדרבה חומש מעכב
BUT IF IT IS NO MORE IN EXISTENCE HE WOULD HAVE TO BRING ANOTHER TRESPASS OFFERING; FOR HE WHO BRINGS [THE RESTITUTION FOR] ROBBERY BEFORE HAVING BROUGHT THE TRESPASS OFFERING FULFILS HIS OBLIGATION, WHEREAS HE WHO BRINGS THE TRESPASS OFFERING BEFORE HAVING BROUGHT [THE RESTITUTION FOR] THE ROBBERY HAS NOT FULFILLED HIS OBLIGATION. IF HE HAS REPAID THE PRINCIPAL BUT NOT THE FIFTH, THE [NON-PAYMENT OF THE] FIFTH IS NO BAR [TO HIS BRINGING THE OFFERING]. <b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. Our Rabbis taught: The trespass:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Num. V. 8. ');"><sup>25</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 219:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.