Commentary for Bava Kamma 222:5

רבא אמר רשות יורש לאו כרשות לוקח דמי והכא במאי עסקינן כשאכלום

But since it is stated in the concluding clause, BUT IF THERE WAS ANYTHING [LEFT] WHICH COULD SERVE AS SECURITY<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Now assumed to denote garments and similar conspicuous articles, as would be the case with real property. ');">⁸</span> THEY WOULD BE LIABLE TO PAY<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the sake of honouring their father. ');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 222:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.