Commentary for Bava Kamma 225:18

א"ר חנינא בר כהנא אמר שמואל במוכס שאין לו קצבה דבי ר' ינאי אמרי במוכס העומד מאליו

maintained that an act done unintentionally could not be prohibited,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As also maintained by R. Simeon in the case of other transgressions; v. Shab. 41b, Keth. 5b a.e. ');">²⁷</span> the other master maintained that an act done unintentionally should also be prohibited;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As indeed maintained by R. Judah in Shab. 41b a.e. ');">²⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 225:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.