Commentary for Bava Kamma 229:14

וסבר רב לא עשו בו תקנת השוק והא רב הונא תלמידיה דרב הוה וחנן בישא גנב גלימא וזבנה אתא לקמיה דרב הונא א"ל לההוא גברא זיל שרי עביטך

maintained that there is no distinction.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As in both these cases the ownership is transferred to the purchaser who may thus retain the articles, while the original owner could have a claim only against the thief. ');">²⁵</span> R. Papa said: Regarding the garment itself<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which has been misappropriated. ');">²⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 229:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.