Commentary for Bava Kamma 229:9

ולאביי דאמר פליגי במאי פליגי בדרב חסדא

weighed it for him, the priest would have to sue the butcher!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Now, we are dealing here with a case where there was no Renunciation (v. p. 681, n. 12); why then does Rab maintain that the priest would have to sue the butcher and not the Purchaser? ');">¹⁵</span> — Read: 'He can sue also the butcher,'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Having the option to sue either the butcher (who is the vendor) or the purchaser, for the reason stated supra p. 681, n. 10. ');">¹⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 229:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.