Commentary for Bava Kamma 30:6
תא שמע זה הכלל כל המשלם יותר על מה שהזיק אינו משלם על פי עצמו מאי לאו הא פחות ממה שהזיק משלם
Why indeed not indicate the distinction in the very same case by stating: 'the rule that liability is established by mere admission is confined to <i>Mu'ad</i>, whereas in the case of <i>Tam</i> no liability is created by mere admission'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because it is considered penal. ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 30:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.