Commentary for Bava Kamma 35:12
לא בפלוגתא דסומכוס ורבנן קמיפלגי
Why is it not evident to him that it is not subject to the law of direct force? Hence the above Baraitha is accordingly more likely to be in accordance with the Rabbis, and proves thus that it is the original cause that has to be followed [as the determining factor]!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., though the bucket rolled to some other place where it broke, the case is still subject to the law of Foot. ');"><sup>12</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 35:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.