Commentary for Bava Kamma 38:4

הכי השתא קרן לאו אורחיה הא אורחיה

But if so, why in the case of Horn shall we not say the same: 'Could the owner be asked to hold the horn of his animal continuously wherever it goes?' — There is no comparison. In the case of Horn the damage is unusual, whereas it is quite usual [for an animal] to knock about with its tail.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Coming thus under the category of Foot, for which there is no liability on public ground. ');">³</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 38:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.