Commentary for Bava Kamma 46:11

ומנא תימרא דתניא הנכנס לחצר בעל הבית שלא ברשות ונגחו שורו של בעל הבית ומת השור בסקילה ובעלים פטורים מן הכופר

For whom is there exemption? — There is exemption for the inciter, but liability upon the owner of the dog. Now if you contend that [whatever is kept in] the mouth of the defendant's cattle is considered [as kept in] the defendant's premises, why should he not say to the plaintiff: What is your hand doing in the mouth of my dog?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For which the dog is not much to blame since it was incited to do it. ');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 46:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.