Commentary for Bava Kamma 5:8
אי קרן כתיב אי רגל כתיב איצטריך סד"א אידי ואידי ארגל הא דאזיל ממילא הא דשלח שלוחי קמ"ל
as denoting Tooth: the one when there is destruction of the corpus and the other when the corpus remains unaffected; it is therefore made known to us that this is not the case. Now that we have identified it with Foot, whence could be inferred the liability of Tooth in cases of non-destruction of the corpus? From the analogy of Foot;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where no term expressing 'Consumption' is employed. ');"><sup>7</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 5:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.