Commentary for Bava Kamma 50:10
ואכתי מופנה מצד אחד הוא הניחא למ"ד מופנה מצד אחד למידין ואין משיבין שפיר אלא למ"ד למידין ומשיבין מאי איכא למימר
Why then had the Divine Law to mention again <i>raiment or skin</i> in the case of dead reptiles?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XI, 32. ');"><sup>25</sup></span> It may thus be concluded that it was [inserted] to be 'free' [for exegetical purposes].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Thus to make the Gezerah shawah irrefutable. ');"><sup>26</sup></span> Still it has so far only been proved that one part [of the <i>Gezerah shawah</i>]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., in the case of dead reptiles. ');"><sup>27</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 50:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.