Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Bava Kamma 52:9

ואמר רבה זרק כלי מראש הגג ובא אחר ושברו במקל פטור מאי טעמא מנא תבירא תבר

cubits but it fell eight cubits away, — if it caused damage there will be liability for Depreciation; regarding the [additional] Four Items there is still exemption;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On account of the absence of a will to do damage. ');"><sup>16</sup></span> concerning Sabbath, if there was express intention that the stone should fall anywhere, there is liability for an offence,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the minimum of distance to constitute the violation of Sabbath by throwing an object in a public thoroughfare is four cubits; v. Shab. 96b. ');"><sup>21</sup></span> but in the absence of such express intention no offence was committed;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 137, n. 7. ');"><sup>26</sup></span> in the case of manslaughter,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 138 n. 3. ');"><sup>27</sup></span>

Tosafot on Bava Kamma

The previous person removed it. - The explanation of Rav Alfas of Ravah and goes with his reasoning, that hat he says he is obligated in Garmi (Later on page 98.) And to the Ree it appears that in this case it is Grama of damages and everybody agreed he is exempt.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse