Commentary for Bava Kamma 62:6

הניחא לשמואל דאמר כל תקלה בור הוא אלא לרב דאמר אי אפקריה אין אי לא לא מאי איכא למימר

to his chattels; the reason being that the [person of the] second is subject to the law applicable to Pit, and no case can be found where Pit would involve liability for inanimate objects.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra p. 18. ');">¹⁰</span> This accords well with the view of Samuel, who holds that all nuisances are [subject to the law applicable to] Pit.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra p. 150. [The person of the second may therefore be treated as Pit.] ');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 62:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.