Commentary for Bava Kamma 93:11

הכניס שורו לחצר בעל הבית שלא

<b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>.IF A POTTER BRINGS HIS WARES INTO THE COURTYARD OF ANOTHER PERSON WITHOUT PERMISSION, AND THE CATTLE OF THE OWNER OF THE COURTYARD BREAKS THEM, THERE IS NO LIABILITY.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the plaintiff was a trespasser. ');">⁹</span> MOREOVER, SHOULD THE ANIMAL BE INJURED BY THEM, THE OWNER OF THE POTTERY IS LIABLE [TO PAY DAMAGES]. IF, HOWEVER, HE BROUGHT [THEM] IN WITH PERMISSION,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which case he was no trespasser ');">¹⁰</span> THE OWNER OF THE COURTYARD IS LIABLE. SIMILARLY IF [A MAN] BRINGS HIS PRODUCE INTO THE COURTYARD OF ANOTHER PERSON WITHOUT PERMISSION AND THE ANIMAL OF THE OWNER OF THE PREMISES CONSUMES IT, THERE IS NO LIABILITY.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V.p. 266, n. 7. ');">¹¹</span> IF IT WAS HARMED BY IT THE OWNER WOULD BE LIABLE. IF, HOWEVER, HE BROUGHT THEM IN WITH PERMISSION,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In which case he was no trespasser ');">¹⁰</span> THE OWNER OF THE PREMISES WOULD BE LIABLE. SO ALSO IF [A MAN] BRINGS HIS OX INTO THE COURTYARD OF ANOTHER WITHOUT

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 93:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.