Commentary for Bava Kamma 95:1

מאי ברשות ומאי שלא ברשות איכא

what has permission or absence of permission to do with the case?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the defendant was not the owner of the premises. ');">¹</span> — I will answer; [Where the produce was brought in] with permission, the case would be one of Tooth [doing damage] in the plaintiff's premises,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the plaintiff obtained a legal right to keep there the object which was subsequently damaged by a stray ox. ');">²</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 95:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.