Commentary for Bava Metzia 133:10
א"ל התם טעמא מאי משום דלא קץ ליה הכא נמי לא קץ ליה
alimony,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The conditions depriving maintenance rights, in respect of an objector, are stated in Keth. 107b thus: If she borrows money in the husband's absence for her maintenance, and then, on his return, she objects, her creditor cannot obtain repayment from him. Tosaf. here states that similar conditions apply to the constitutionally barren woman, her borrowings having been made before she was certified as such. With respect to a 'secondary relation', Tosaf. maintains that the reference is to her widowhood; after her husband's death, she cannot demand maintenance from his estate. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Metzia 133:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.