Commentary for Bava Metzia 200:4
קשיא ליה לרב ששת זוקקין אתא לאשמועינן תנינא זוקקין הנכסים שאין להן אחריות את הנכסים שיש להן אחריות לישבע עליהן
This presented a difficulty to R. Shesheth: Does he [the Tanna] wish to teach us that [movable property] binds [immovable]? But we have already learnt it: Unsecured chattels bind secured property in respect of an oath!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'Unsecured' and 'secured' refer to movable and immovable property respectively. V. preceding note. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Metzia 200:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.