Commentary for Bava Metzia 230:2
לימא אביי ורבא בפלוגתא דרב הונא ורב יהודה קמיפלגי
Shall we say that Abaye and Raba differ in the same controversy as R. Huna and Rab Judah? For Raba said: If one ate it [the Paschal sacrifice] half roasted, he is flagellated twice: once on account of [the injunction against] half-roast [flesh]. and again because of the verse, [Eat not…] but roast with fire. [If he ate it] boiled, he is flagellated twice: once because of the prohibition against boiled [flesh], and again because of the Verse, [Eat not…] but roast with fire. For both half-roast and boiled, he is flagellated thrice, on account of [the injunction against] half-roast, boiled, and the injunction, Eat not … but roast with fire.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This refers to: Eat not of it raw, nor sodden (i.e., boiled) at all with water, but roast with fire, Ex. XII, 9. ');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Metzia 230:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.