Commentary for Bava Metzia 4:11
אפי' תימא סומכוס כי אמר סומכוס שמא ושמא אבל ברי וברי לא אמר
But does not Rabbah the son of R. Huna maintain that Symmachus's decision applies also to a case where both parties are certain and definite in their claims?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which makes the above distinction (between 'certain' and 'uncertain') invalid? ');"><sup>9</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Metzia 4:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.