Commentary for Bava Metzia 71:1
פעמים ששניהם באשם פעמים שהשוכר בחטאת והשואל באשם פעמים שהשוכר באשם והשואל בחטאת
Sometimes both are liable to a guilt-offering, sometimes the hirer is liable to a sin-offering and the borrower to a guilt-offering, and sometimes the hirer is liable to a guilt-offering and the borrower to a sin-offering.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The reference is to the Mishnah, where the hirer of an animal then lends it to another. ');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Tosafot on Bava Metzia
From here it is possible to prove that the law is like the opnoin that holds that a renter is similar to (in responsibility) a paid watchman.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Tosafot on Bava Metzia
its also possible to prove from the start of chapter a widow to a kohen Godal (Yevumas 66b) and in chapter the borrower (later in Bava Metzia 97a) in the case of mareimer the son of chanina .....
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy