Commentary for Bava Metzia 71:10
ולטעמיה דר' יוחנן לא מיבעיא שומר שכר שמסר לשומר חנם דגרועי גרעה לשמירתו אלא אפי' ש"ח שמסר לשומר שכר דעלויי עלייה לשמירתו חייב דא"ל אין רצוני שיהא פקדוני ביד אחר
It has been stated: If one bailee entrusted [his bailment] to another bailee — Rab said: He is not liable;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For whatever he would not have been liable had he kept it himself. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Tosafot on Bava Metzia
From here it is possible to prove that the law is like the opnoin that holds that a renter is similar to (in responsibility) a paid watchman.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Tosafot on Bava Metzia
its also possible to prove from the start of chapter a widow to a kohen Godal (Yevumas 66b) and in chapter the borrower (later in Bava Metzia 97a) in the case of mareimer the son of chanina .....
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy