Commentary for Bava Metzia 71:7
מאי קמ"ל לאפוקי מדרבי אמי דאמר כל שבועה שהדיינים משביעים אותה אין חייבין עליה משום שבועת ביטוי שנאמר (ויקרא ה, ד) או נפש כי תשבע לבטא בשפתים כי תשבע מעצמה קמ"ל דלא כר' אמי
— [His purpose is] to oppose R. Ammi's dictum, viz., For every oath which the judges impose no liability is incurred on account of an 'oath of utterance' because it is said, Or if a soul swear, uttering with his lips [etc.],<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. V, 4. ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Tosafot on Bava Metzia
From here it is possible to prove that the law is like the opnoin that holds that a renter is similar to (in responsibility) a paid watchman.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Tosafot on Bava Metzia
its also possible to prove from the start of chapter a widow to a kohen Godal (Yevumas 66b) and in chapter the borrower (later in Bava Metzia 97a) in the case of mareimer the son of chanina .....
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy