Commentary for Bekhorot 121:37
ומאי שנא מהא דתנן
or increased it by ten, his terumah is valid!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ter. IV, 4. Why cannot the owner say here, as R. Papa maintains above, that the one in forty which the agent separated as terumah was a mistake which caused him a loss and that therefore his agency is void?');"><sup>25</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bekhorot 121:37. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.