Commentary for Bekhorot 65:42

דתנן היו לפניו שתי חטאות אחת תמימה ואחת בעלת מום תמימה תקרב בעלת מום תיפדה

R'Eleazar B'R'Simeon however says: Even if the flesh [of the blemished one] is already in the pot, if the blood of the unblemished one had been sprinkled, it is forbidden [to be eaten].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Although its slaughtering took place before the sprinkling of the blood of the unblemished animal and although the flesh in the pot is considered as boiled, since it was not to be eaten till after the sprinkling of the other animal, it is forbidden to be eaten altogether, for it is like a sin-offering whose owner has already atoned for, retaining its holy status even after its slaughtering, v. Tem. 24a.');">²⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Bekhorot 65:42. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.