Commentary for Bekhorot 88:61
קשיא ליה לרבי עקיבא
<big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>R'Ishmael [who differs from the opinion of the first Tanna in the Mishnah] found this opinion difficult to accept, [for if so], 'it ought to read: Hasar ashek.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If the first Tanna were correct, that the Bible means that the testicles were absent, then it should have said hasar etc., i.e., deficient in testicles. jrunn jrunn');"><sup>29</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bekhorot 88:61. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.