Commentary for Chullin 103:45

מכלל דרב כהנא ורב אסי צלע בלא חוליא אמרי ואמר להו

But if so, i not this case identical with Rab's own statement?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For, as we have explained: Rab also was dealing with the dislocation of a rib plus half of its vertebra. i.e., its facet, and he ruled that it was trefah; why then did R. Kahana and R. Assi enquire of Rab as to the dislocation of two ribs and their facets? That would surely be trefah!');">²¹</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 103:45. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.