Commentary for Chullin 137:44
אלא כל מכח לא אמרינן דשרי והכי קמיבעיא לן
How is it then that we have learnt: 'One cannot make a limb a substitute for a consecrated foetus, or a foetus for a consecrated limb, or a limb or a foetus for a whole [consecrated animal], or a whole animal for either of these'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tem. 10a. Cf. Lev. XXVII, 10, where the term 'beast' is also used and on this account the law is established that a foetus or a limb is precluded from the law of substitution.');"><sup>26</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Chullin 137:44. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.