Commentary for Chullin 138:41
אינו קדוש
Rabbah, however, says it is not holy, because he maintains that the holiness is prospective,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., at the beginning of the delivery no holiness attached to it, and the gentile purchaser of the first third has made a valid purchase. Consequently this firstling even when it is fully born is not holy because of the share which the gentile has in it. Cf. Num. III, 13, and Bek. I, 2.');"><sup>22</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Chullin 138:41. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.