Commentary for Chullin 150:3

טעון שחיטה כמאן כר"מ ואם מת טהור מלטמא במשא כמאן כרבנן

Thereupon Rabbah said to him: The ruling 'it needs to be slaughtered' obviously follows R'Meir's view, whereas the ruling 'it is clean and does not convey uncleanness by carrying' obviously follows the Rabbis' view! - But according to your argument, you could raise this same objection against R'Hiyya; for R'Hiyya taught: If a person slaughtered a trefah [animal] and found in it a nine months' living foetus, it needs to be slaughtered and is subject to the [priests' dues of the] shoulder, and the two cheeks, and the maw.

Explore commentary for Chullin 150:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.