Commentary for Chullin 172:33

אמרו לו

This is what the Rabbis meant: Is not the particle 'or' required to show disjunction?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For without 'or' it might have been said that the law of 'covering up' does not apply unless a wild animal and a bird were slaughtered.');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 172:33. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.